Animation in user interfaces: principles and techniques
User interface software
CHI '95 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Assessing dynamics in computer-based instruction
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Parallel N-free order recognition
Ordal'94 Selected papers from the conference on Orders, algorithms and applications
The (in)effectiveness of animation in instruction
CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Special issue: Interactive graphical communication
Animated visualization of causal relations through growing 2D geometry
Information Visualization - Special issue: Software visualization
Causality visualization using animated growing polygons
INFOVIS'03 Proceedings of the Ninth annual IEEE conference on Information visualization
Analyzing animated representations of complex causal semantics
Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization
Visual comparison for information visualization
Information Visualization - Special issue on State of the Field and New Research Directions
EuroVis'08 Proceedings of the 10th Joint Eurographics / IEEE - VGTC conference on Visualization
Perceiving complex causation through interaction
Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational Aesthetics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Michotte's theory of ampliation suggests that causal relationships are perceived by objects animated under appropriate spatiotemporal conditions. We extend the theory of ampliation and propose that the immediate perception of complex causal relations is also dependent on a set of structural and temporal rules. We designed animated representations, based on Michotte's rules, for showing complex causal relationships or causal semantics. In this paper we describe a set of animations for showing semantics such as causal amplification, causal strength, causal dampening, and causal multiplicity. In a two part study we compared the effectiveness of both the static and animated representations. The first study (N=44) asked participants to recall passages that were previously displayed using both types of representations. Participants were 8% more accurate in recalling causal semantics when they were presented using animations instead of static graphs. In the second study (N=112) we evaluated the intuitiveness of the representations. Our results showed that while users were as accurate with the static graphs as with the animations, they were 9% faster in matching the correct causal statements in the animated condition. Overall our results show that animated diagrams that are designed based on perceptual rules such as those proposed by Michotte have the potential to facilitate comprehension of complex causal relations.