Confidence intervals for parameters of two diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard

Authors:
James D. Stamey;Doyle H. Boese;Dean M. Young
Affiliations:
Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7140, USA;Infineum USA L.P., Linden, NJ 07036, USA;Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7140, USA
Venue:
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Year:
2008

Citing 2
Cited 2

Estimating the ratio of two Poisson rates

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Confidence intervals for a binomial parameter based on binary data subject to false-positive misclassification

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis

Editorial: Computational statistics within clinical research

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
Partially identified prevalence estimation under misclassification using the kappa coefficient

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.03

Visualization

Abstract

We derive a profile-likelihood confidence interval and a score based confidence interval to estimate the population prevalences, test sensitivities, and test specificities of two conditionally independent diagnostic tests when no gold standard is available. We are motivated by a real-data example on the study of the properties for two fallible diagnostic tests for bovine immunodeficiency virus. We compare the coverage and average width of two new intervals with an interval based on the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator and a Bayesian interval estimator via Monte Carlo simulation. We determine that for the parameter configurations considered here, the profile-likelihood, score, and Bayesian intervals all perform adequately in terms of coverage, but overall, the profile-likelihood interval performs best in terms of yielding at least nominal coverage with minimum expected width.