Consonant approximation of belief functions
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Approximations for efficient computation in the theory of evidence
Artificial Intelligence
Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data
Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data
Mathematics of Data Fusion
Uncertainty-Based Information: Elements of Generalized Information Theory
Uncertainty-Based Information: Elements of Generalized Information Theory
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Cut sets on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
FSKD'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery - Volume 6
Hi-index | 0.20 |
With the recent rising of numerous theories for dealing with uncertain pieces of information, the problem of connection between different frames has become an issue. In particular, questions such as how to combine fuzzy sets with belief functions or probability measures often emerge. The alternative is either to define transformations between theories, or to use a general or unified framework in which all these theories can be framed. Random set theory has been proposed as such a unified framework in which at least probability theory, evidence theory, possibility theory and fuzzy set theory can be represented. Whereas the transformations of belief functions or probability distributions into random sets are trivial, the transformations of fuzzy sets or possibility distributions into random sets lead to some issues. This paper is concerned with the transformation of fuzzy membership functions into random sets. In practice, this transformation involves the creation of a large number of focal elements (subsets with non-null probability) based on the @a-cuts of the fuzzy membership functions. In order to keep a computationally tractable fusion process, the large number of focal elements needs to be reduced by approximation techniques. In this paper, we propose three approximation techniques and compare them to classical approximations techniques used in evidence theory. The quality of the approximations is quantified using a distance between two random sets.