Intelligence without representation
Artificial Intelligence
Synthetic ethology and the evolution of cooperative communication
Adaptive Behavior
An introduction to genetic algorithms
An introduction to genetic algorithms
An investigation into the evolution of communication
Adaptive Behavior
A continuous evolutionary simulation model of the attainability of honest signalling equilibria
ALIFE Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial life
Tough guys don't dance: intention movements and the evolution of signalling in animal contests
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior on From animals to animats 5
Simulating the evolution of language
Simulating the evolution of language
Natural language from artificial life
Artificial Life
Artificial Life
Origins of communication in evolving robots
SAB'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on From Animals to Animats: simulation of Adaptive Behavior
Evolution of communication and language using signals, symbols, andwords
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Like any other biological trait, communication can be studied from at least four perspectives: mechanistic, ontogenetic, functional, and phylogenetic. In this article, we focus on the following phylogenetic question: how can communication emerge, given that both signal-producing and signal-responding abilities seem to be adaptively neutral until the complementary ability is present in the population? We explore the problem of co-evolution of speakers and hearers with artificial life simulations: a population of artificial neural networks evolving a food call system. The core of the article is devoted to a careful analysis of the complex evolutionary dynamics demonstrated by our simple simulation. Our analyses reveal an important factor, which might solve the phylogenetic problem: the spontaneous production of good (meaningful) signals by speakers because of the need for organisms to categorize their experience in adaptively relevant ways. We discuss our results with respect both to previous simulative work and to the biological literature on the evolution of communication.