On the roots of independence polynomials of almost all very well-covered graphs

  • Authors:
  • Vadim E. Levit;Eugen Mandrescu

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, Holon Institute of Technology, 52 Golomb Street, P.O. Box 305, Holon 58102, Israel and Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Ariel University Center of Sa ...;Department of Computer Science, Holon Institute of Technology, 52 Golomb Street, P.O. Box 305, Holon 58102, Israel

  • Venue:
  • Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.04

Visualization

Abstract

If s"k denotes the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, and @a(G) is the size of a maximum stable set, then I(G;x)=@?"k"="0^@a^(^G^)s"kx^k is the independence polynomial of G [I. Gutman, F. Harary, Generalizations of the matching polynomial, Utilitas Math. 24 (1983) 97-106]. A graph G is very well-covered [O. Favaron, Very well-covered graphs, Discrete Math. 42 (1982) 177-187] if it has no isolated vertices, its order equals 2@a(G) and it is well-covered, i.e., all its maximal independent sets are of the same size [M.D. Plummer, Some covering concepts in graphs, J. Combin. Theory 8 (1970) 91-98]. For instance, appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G yields a very well-covered graph, which we denote by G^*. Under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G^* for some G [A. Finbow, B. Hartnell, R.J. Nowakowski, A characterization of well-covered graphs of girth 5 or greater, J. Combin. Theory Ser B 57 (1993) 44-68]. The root of the smallest modulus of the independence polynomial of any graph is real [J.I. Brown, K. Dilcher, R.J. Nowakowski, Roots of independence polynomials of well-covered graphs, J. Algebraic Combin. 11 (2000) 197-210]. The location of the roots of the independence polynomial in the complex plane, and the multiplicity of the root of the smallest modulus are investigated in a number of articles. In this paper we establish formulae connecting the coefficients of I(G;x) and I(G^*;x), which allow us to show that the number of roots of I(G;x) is equal to the number of roots of I(G^*;x) different from -1, which appears as a root of multiplicity @a(G^*)-@a(G) for I(G^*;x). We also prove that the real roots of I(G^*;x) are in [-1,-1/2@a(G^*)), while for a general graph of order n we show that its roots lie in |z|1/(2n-1). Hoede and Li [Clique polynomials and independent set polynomials of graphs, Discrete Math. 125 (1994) 219-228] posed the problem of finding graphs that can be uniquely defined by their clique polynomials (clique-unique graphs). Stevanovic [Clique polynomials of threshold graphs, Univ. Beograd Publ. Elektrotehn. Fac., Ser. Mat. 8 (1997) 84-87] proved that threshold graphs are clique-unique. Here, we demonstrate that the independence polynomial distinguishes well-covered spiders (K"1","n^*,n=1) among well-covered trees.