Comparative analysis of IEEE 802.1x authentication methods

Authors:
Monis Akhlaq;Baber Aslam;Muzammil A. Khan;M. Noman Jafri
Affiliations:
Information Security Department, College of Signals, National University of Sciences & Technology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan;Information Security Department, College of Signals, National University of Sciences & Technology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan;Information Security Department, College of Signals, National University of Sciences & Technology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan;Information Security Department, College of Signals, National University of Sciences & Technology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Venue:
ICCOM'07 Proceedings of the 11th Conference on 11th WSEAS International Conference on Communications - Volume 11
Year:
2007

Citing 3
Cited 1

Measured Performance of the IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN

LCN '99 Proceedings of the 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks
Throughput performance of the distributed and point coordination functions of an IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN

ICCC '02 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Computer communication
Security performance of loaded IEEE 802.11b wireless networks

Computer Communications

Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.1x authentication methods and recommended usage

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMMUNICATIONS

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The IEEE Standard 802.11 is one of the most widely adopted mechanisms for WLANs, it provides comprehensive guidelines for their operational smoothness. 802.11 suffered from limited data confidentiality and cumbersome procedure for exchange of security parameters. In response to the security limitations in 802.11, IEEE introduced 802.1x for authentication and key management. The 802.1x is a port based network access control protocol that uses Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) at the transport layer. The 802.1x only defines authentication mechanism and does not recommend any appropriate authentication method. Consequently wireless vendors implemented their own 802.1x adaptations such as MD5 (Message Digest 5), TLS (Transport Layer Security), TTLS (Tunneled TLS), PEAP (Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol), LEAP (Lightweight Extensible Authentication Protocol) etc. The paper analyses the performance of 802.1x authentication with respect to different solutions i.e, EAP TLS, PEAP and EAP TTLS. The network performance is gauged with respect to throughput, round time trip (RTT)/response time and packet error in different configurations.