Alternative thread scoring methods in qualitative event graphs

  • Authors:
  • Ricki G. Ingalls;Douglas J. Morrice

  • Affiliations:
  • Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK;The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Event Graphs (EGs) and Simulation Graph Models provide a powerful and general modeling framework for discrete event simulation. Qualitative Event Graphs (QEGs) extend the EG framework to a qualitative approach to discrete-event simulation. In QEG, the uncertainty in event execution times is represented by a closed interval in the set of real numbers. When two or more event execution intervals overlap, multiple event execution sequences or threads result. This leads to simulation output in the form of multiple threads. In general, the number of threads can explode exponentially making output difficult to analyze. In this paper, we introduce three scoring methods to rank the threads on the relative likelihood of their event execution sequences. We discuss the assumptions of these methods along with their advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the needs of the user, scoring and ranking could help eliminate the need to execute some threads and cut the execution time of the simulation.