ESWC '07 Proceedings of the 4th European conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems
Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
Rapid benchmarking for semantic web knowledge base systems
ISWC'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on The Semantic Web
A comparison of reasoning techniques for querying large description logic ABoxes
LPAR'06 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning
Towards a complete OWL ontology benchmark
ESWC'06 Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on The Semantic Web: research and applications
Semantics-Enabled Service Discovery Framework in the SIMDAT Pharma Grid
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
DOGMA: A Disk-Oriented Graph Matching Algorithm for RDF Databases
ISWC '09 Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference
Comparison of ontology reasoning systems using custom rules
Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
Semi-automatic construction of domain ontology for agent reasoning
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A number of ontology reasoning systems have been developed for reasoning and querying the semantic web. Since they implement different reasoning algorithms and optimization techniques, they differ in a number of ways. Previous attempts at comparing performance of ontology reasoning systems have mainly considered performances of individual query requests. In this paper, we present the results of testing four of the most popular ontology reasoning systems on query sequences that reflect real world use cases. We believe that using query sequences is a more effective way to evaluate ontology reasoning systems.