Slip errors and cue salience

  • Authors:
  • Jonathan Back;Ann Blandford;Paul Curzon

  • Affiliations:
  • University College London, London, UK;University College London, London, UK;University of London, London, UK

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Motivation -- Many empirical accounts of slip errors have focused on identifying causal factors. However, to what extent can avoiding slip errors be considered a cognitive skill? Research approach -- A series of experiments have shown that some actions seem to "spring to mind" for the performance of a task, whereas others do not, and that the latter are much more likely than the former to feature in erroneous actions. Findings -- The results suggest that procedural and sensory cues need to be strong enough to capture a participant's attention away from actions that "spring to mind". Research limitations/Implications -- Avoiding error can be considered a cognitive skill when a 'window of opportunity' is utilised to rehearse procedural steps or when participants are able to create their own environmental cues. Originality/Value -- The research suggests that identifying how people avoid making errors can provide us with a deeper understanding of why errors happen. Take away message -- Rehearsal and personalised cue creation is spontaneous and can be used to minimize the likelihood of error.