Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers
SIGCOMM '94 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
Performance of multipath routing for on-demand protocols in mobile ad hoc networks
Mobile Networks and Applications
Neighborhood aware source routing
MobiHoc '01 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
Associativity-Based Routing for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks
Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
On-Demand Multi Path Distance Vector Routing in Ad Hoc Networks
ICNP '01 Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Network Protocols
Adaptive channel width for MASNET routeless routing protocol
CCNC'10 Proceedings of the 7th IEEE conference on Consumer communications and networking conference
Efficient geographic routeless routing protocols with enhanced location update mechanism
International Journal of Sensor Networks
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Bypass-AODV, a local recovery protocol, is proposed to enhance the performance of AODV routing protocol by overcoming several inherited problems such as unnecessary error recovery invocations, newly non-optimal reconstructed routes, high packet drop ratios, and high routing overheads. Bypass-AODV uses cross-layer MAC-notification to identify mobility-related link break, and then setup a bypass between the broken-link end nodes via an alternative node while keeps on the rest of the route. Therefore, Bypass-AODV enhances resource utilization by avoiding unnecessary error recovery cycles and consequently increases the network throughput. On the other hand, Bypass-AODV enhances route reliability; it avoids dropping packets by transmitting them over the constructed bypass. The simulation results show that when running 1-TCP connection, Bypass-AODV performs better than AODV. In particular, this behavior is rapidly changed with increasing the physical distance between the TCP connection end nodes beyond 2 hops. For example, when number of hops is equal to 6, goodput is enhanced by more than 100% compared to AODV for a 1-TCP connection and about 24% for multiple TCP connections. Further, the ratio of packet drop is reduced from 16% to 2%. Moreover, considering the hop count, the Bypass-AODV shows less sensitivity to the ongoing number of TCP connections.