International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Using Web annotations for asynchronous collaboration around documents
CSCW '00 Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
GeoNotes: Social and Navigational Aspects of Location-Based Information Systems
UbiComp '01 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Ubiquitous Computing
Software Support for Annotation of Visualized Data Using Hand-Drawn Marks
IV '05 Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation
From the lab to the field Steve Roth: a memoriam
Information Visualization
Facilitating participatory decision-making in local communities through map-based online discussion
Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies
Combining synchronous and asynchronous collaboration within 3D city models
GIScience'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Geographic information science
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper addresses a key problem in the development of visual-analytical collaborative tools, how to design map-based displays to enable productive group work. We introduce a group communication theory, the Collective Information Sharing (CIS) bias, and discuss how it relates to communicative goals that need to be considered when designing collaborative, visually enabled, spatial-decision-support tools. The CIS bias framework suggests that key goals for developing such tools should be: (a) the harnessing of a group's collective knowledge emerging from collaborative discussions and (b) reducing the repeat of information that has already been shared within the group. We propose that web-accessible, map annotation tools are ideally suited to advancing these goals and outline how the CIS bias framework informs how geospatial annotation tools can maximize the potential of collaborative efforts. We offer design recommendations for annotation tools that function to: (a) facilitate access to and recall of geographically referenced discussion contributions, (b) document ideas for private as well as public discussion spaces, and (c) elicit all group members to contribute information in a given collaborative effort.