The roots of computer supported argument visualization
Visualizing argumentation
Enhancing deliberation through computer supported argument visualization
Visualizing argumentation
DSS in a local government context – how to support decisions nobody wants to make?
EGOV'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Electronic Government
Logical argument mapping: a cognitive-change-based method for building common ground
ICPW '07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Pragmatic web
Using Argument Visualization to Enhance e-Participation in the Legislation Formation Process
ePart '09 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Electronic Participation
The AUGMENT project: co-constructive mapping and support of accessibility and participation
ePart'10 Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP WG 8.5 international conference on Electronic participation
Intentional modeling of social media design knowledge for government-citizen communication
MSM'10/MUSE'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Analysis of social media and ubiquitous data
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This article investigates to what extent computer-supported argument visualization can be designed to encourage debate and deliberation by citizens on public issues. Such argument maps use icons and arrows to represent the structure of a series of related viewpoints, reducing the amount of text necessary to convey the ideas, thereby clarifying the issue under consideration. Argument maps have the potential to provide a readily accessible medium by which citizens can follow and join in public debates on policy issues. In this article we describe our approach and the type of maps we have chosen to use and then demonstrate the potential of a collection of maps to form a "policy memory" to support policy development. Our case study is the development of the "smoking in public places" policy in the Scottish Parliament. Our overall aim is to engage citizens in democratic decision making, leading to better policymaking and a more engaged citizenry.