Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research

Authors:
Tove Faber Frandsen;Jeppe Nicolaisen
Affiliations:
Royal School of Library and Information Science, Birketinget 6, DK-2300 Copenhagen S., Denmark;Royal School of Library and Information Science, Birketinget 6, DK-2300 Copenhagen S., Denmark
Venue:
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Year:
2008

Citing 6
Cited 2

Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication

Journal of the American Society for Information Science
The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains: how many databases are needed?

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Bibliographic index coverage of a multidisciplinary field

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management)

Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management)
Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Citation analysis

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Bibliographic databases (including databases based on open access) are routinely used for bibliometric research. The value of a specific database depends to a large extent on the coverage of the discipline(s) under study. A number of studies have determined the coverage of databases in specific disciplines focusing on interdisciplinary differences; however, little is known about the potential existence of intradisciplinary differences in database coverage. Focusing on intradisciplinary differences, the article documents large database-coverage differences within two disciplines (economics and psychology). The point extends to include both the uneven coverage of specialties and research traditions. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed, and precautions which need to be taken are outlined. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.