An assessment of the current state of product data technologies

Authors:
Wim Gielingh
Affiliations:
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Venue:
Computer-Aided Design
Year:
2008

Citing 1
Cited 12

On validating STEP product data exchange

Computer-Aided Design

Editorial

Computer-Aided Design
Incorporating design outsourcing decisions within the design of collaborative design processes

Computers in Industry
Protection of intellectual property based on a skeleton model in product design collaboration

Computer-Aided Design
Five decades of Computer-Aided Ship Design

Computer-Aided Design
A review of the use of asset information standards for collaboration in the process industry

Computers in Industry
Quality assessment of coupled civil engineering applications

Advanced Engineering Informatics
A method to exchange procedurally represented 2D CAD model data using ISO 10303 STEP

Computer-Aided Design
A procedural method to exchange editable 3D data from a free-hand 2D sketch modeling system into 3D mechanical CAD systems

Computer-Aided Design
A collaborative platform for integrating and optimising Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis requests

Computer-Aided Design
A collaborative and integrated platform to support distributed manufacturing system using a service-oriented approach based on cloud computing paradigm

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
An interoperable solution for Cloud manufacturing

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Interpreting the semantics of GD&T specifications of a product for tolerance analysis

Computer-Aided Design

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Industrial organizations can benefit from the exchange or sharing of digital product data across the borders of disciplines, organizations and vendor-specific solutions. A number of international standards have been developed to make this possible. Of these, ISO 10303 (STEP), ISO/PAS 16739 (IAI/IFC) and ISO 15926 are the most prominent. The first release of STEP was published in 1994, the first release of IAI/IFC in 1997, and ISO 15926 in 2003. Today, many years after their introduction, it must be concluded that the industrial uptake of these standards has been poor. It must be concluded further that, with the current generation of PDT standards, the loss of data or meaning can hardly be avoided. Data exchange between heterogeneous applications is not really supported. In industrial practice, product data are still exchanged in native file formats, less 'intelligent' electronic standards, or-even worse-via paper media. The anticipated benefits of PDT standards are not yet reaped by industry. This article discusses the causes of poor performance and poor industrial uptake, with the aim to encourage the development of new strategies and technologies.