Combining Prioritized Decisions in Classification

  • Authors:
  • Yaxin Bi;Shengli Wu;Gongde Guo

  • Affiliations:
  • School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Ulster at Jordanstwon, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, UK;School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Ulster at Jordanstwon, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, UK;Department of Computer Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, China

  • Venue:
  • MDAI '07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we present an alternative evidential method of combining prioritized decisions, in order to arrive at a "consensus", or aggregate, decision. Previous studies have suggested that, in some classification domains, the better performance can be achieved through combining the first and second decisions from each evidence source. However, it is easy to illustrate the fact that going further down a decision list, to give longer preferred decisions, can provide the alternative to the method of combining only the first one and second decisions. Our objective here is to examine the theoretical aspect of an alternative method in terms of quartet茂戮驴 how extending a decision list of any length by one extra preferred decision affects classification results. We also present the experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of our alternative method.