Decision Combination in Multiple Classifier Systems
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Machine Learning
Machine Learning - special issue on inductive logic programming
Machine Learning - Special issue on inductive transfer
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Machine Learning
Predicting Chemical Parameters of River Water Quality from Bioindicator Data
Applied Intelligence
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Top-Down Induction of Clustering Trees
ICML '98 Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning
Simultaneous Prediction of Mulriple Chemical Parameters of River Water Quality with TILDE
PKDD '99 Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Bloomy Decision Tree for Multi-objective Classification
PKDD '01 Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Knowledge Discovery in Multi-label Phenotype Data
PKDD '01 Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning
MCS '00 Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems
A Comparison of Decision Tree Ensemble Creation Techniques
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Beam search induction and similarity constraints for predictive clustering trees
KDID'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Knowledge discovery in inductive databases
Decision trees for hierarchical multilabel classification: a case study in functional genomics
PKDD'06 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Principle and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases
Constraint based induction of multi-objective regression trees
KDID'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Knowledge Discovery in Inductive Databases
ImageCLEF 2009 medical image annotation task: PCTs for hierarchical multi-label classification
CLEF'09 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Cross-language evaluation forum: multimedia experiments
Evaluation of distance measures for multi-class classification in binary SVM decision tree
ICAISC'10 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and soft computing: Part I
ICPR'10 Proceedings of the 20th International conference on Recognizing patterns in signals, speech, images, and videos
Hierarchical annotation of medical images
Pattern Recognition
An extensive experimental comparison of methods for multi-label learning
Pattern Recognition
Tree ensembles for predicting structured outputs
Pattern Recognition
Multi-Label Classification Method for Multimedia Tagging
International Journal of Multimedia Data Engineering & Management
Iterative classification for multiple target attributes
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
Context-Aware predictions on business processes: an ensemble-based solution
NFMCP'12 Proceedings of the First international conference on New Frontiers in Mining Complex Patterns
Multi-label learning with millions of labels: recommending advertiser bid phrases for web pages
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
Multi-target regression with rule ensembles
The Journal of Machine Learning Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Ensemble methods are able to improve the predictive performance of many base classifiers. Up till now, they have been applied to classifiers that predict a single target attribute. Given the non-trivial interactions that may occur among the different targets in multi-objective prediction tasks, it is unclear whether ensemble methods also improve the performance in this setting. In this paper, we consider two ensemble learning techniques, bagging and random forests, and apply them to multi-objective decision trees (MODTs), which are decision trees that predict multiple target attributes at once. We empirically investigate the performance of ensembles of MODTs. Our most important conclusions are: (1) ensembles of MODTs yield better predictive performance than MODTs, and (2) ensembles of MODTs are equally good, or better than ensembles of single-objective decision trees, i.e., a set of ensembles for each target. Moreover, ensembles of MODTs have smaller model size and are faster to learn than ensembles of single-objective decision trees.