Comparing Topic Maps Constraint Specification Languages

  • Authors:

  • Giovani Rubert Librelotto;Renato Preigschadt Azevedo;José Carlos Ramalho;Pedro Rangel Henriques

  • Affiliations:

  • UNIFRA, Centro Universitário Franciscano, Santa Maria, Brasil 97010-032;UNIFRA, Centro Universitário Franciscano, Santa Maria, Brasil 97010-032;Departamento de Informática, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal 4710-057;Departamento de Informática, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal 4710-057

  • Venue:
  • Scaling Topic Maps
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Topic Map Constraint Language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of Topic Maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of Topic Maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma, and XTche relate to Topic Maps Constraint Language (TMCL)? What kind of constraints each one of these three can not specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those Topic Maps constraint languages over the use case proposed.