Evaluation of Information Visualization Tools Using the NFR Approach

Authors:
Pushpa Kumar;Nary Subramanian;Kang Zhang
Affiliations:
University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA TX 75080;University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, USA TX 75799;University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA TX 75080
Venue:
VISUAL '08 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Visual Information Systems: Web-Based Visual Information Search and Management
Year:
2008

Citing 5
Cited 0

An empirical comparison of visualization tools to assist information retrieval on the Web

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Process-Oriented Metrics for Software Architecture Adaptability

RE '01 Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering
The challenge of information visualization evaluation

Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Social Network Analysis of Online Marketplaces

ICEBE '07 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Determination of quality of information visualization (infovis) tools will assist practitioners in industry and academia to choose the appropriate tools for their needs. Infovis tools are widely used to visualize data-intensive applications so that quick decisions may be taken. In this paper we use a novel technique, the NFR Approach, to determine quality of infovis tools. The NFR Approach considers visualizability as an important non-functional requirement (NFR) for infovis tools and evaluates visualizability to determine the quality of these tools. The chief artifact that the NFR Approach employs for evaluation is the softgoal interdependency graph (SIG) wherein factors affecting visualizabil-ity are related to tool features by means of contributions that come in four flavors. Well-defined propagation rules help determine a qualitative score for visualizability based on the contributions. The chief advantages of the NFR Approach include rationale for the scores, flexibility to accommodate different definitions for visualizability, and historical record-keeping. The NFR Approach is validated by applying the Approach to three infovis tools --- Prefuse, Tom Sawyer, and GnuPlot.