A Framework for Comparing Perspectives on Privacy and Pervasive Technologies

Authors:
Anne R. Jacobs;Gregory D. Abowd
Affiliations:
Georgia Institute of Technology;Georgia Institute of Technology
Venue:
IEEE Pervasive Computing
Year:
2003

Citing 0
Cited 5

Privacy and proportionality: adapting legal evaluation techniques to inform design in ubiquitous computing

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
End-user privacy in human-computer interaction

Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction
Devices that tell on you: privacy trends in consumer ubiquitous computing

SS'07 Proceedings of 16th USENIX Security Symposium on USENIX Security Symposium
Parenting from the pocket: value tensions and technical directions for secure and private parent-teen mobile safety

Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
Investigating receptiveness to sensing and inference in the home using sensor proxies

Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Each of the many viable definitions of personal privacy reflects a distinct set of beliefs about what types of information the courts should protect. As those beliefs change and evolve, so does the law. Pervasive computing research has also evolved, investigating mechanisms for supporting some predefined notion of privacy, typically favoring individual rights over the rights of the community. Developing a framework for judging pervasive technologies against social norms can give technology developers insight into how and why the systems they create test those norms.