OntoDSL: An Ontology-Based Framework for Domain-Specific Languages
MODELS '09 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
Can domain-specific languages be implemented by service-oriented architecture?
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Evaluating the benefits of using domain-specific modeling languages: an experience report
Proceedings of the 2013 ACM workshop on Domain-specific modeling
An ontology-based framework for domain-specific modeling
Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM)
Introducing domain-specific language implementation using web service-oriented technologies
Multiagent and Grid Systems - Development of service-based and agent-based computing systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A resurging interest in domain-specific languages (DSLs) has identified the benefits to be realized from customized languages that provide a high-level of abstraction for specifying a problem concept in a particular domain. Although there has been much success reported by industry practitioners and academic researchers, there is much more work that is needed to enable further adoption of DSLs. The goal of this panel is to separate the hype from the true advantages that DSLs provide. The panel discussion will offer insight into the nature of DSL design, implementation, and application and summarize the collective experience of the panel in successful deployment of DSLs. As a counterpoint to the current benefits of DSLs, the panel will provide a fair and balanced assessment of the current state of the art of DSLs by pointing to the existing limitations and future work that is needed to take the concept of DSLs to further heights. The assembled panelists are experts in the research and practice of DSLs and represent diverse views and backgrounds. The panel is made up of industrial researchers, commercial tool vendors, and academic researchers. The panelists have different perspectives on the technical concerns of DSLs; for example, half of the panelists are proponents of textual DSLs and the other half of the panel has experience in graphical notations representing visual languages.