Computer
Improving data warehouse and business information quality: methods for reducing costs and increasing profits
Information Orientation: The Link to Business Performance
Information Orientation: The Link to Business Performance
Do as I do:: authorial leadership in wikipedia
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis
Multidisciplinarity and 21st century communication design
Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication
The collaborative construction of "fact" on Wikipedia
Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication
Organizational wiki as a knowledge management tool
Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
Different contributor profiles in an organizational wiki
Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication
Producers and evaluators of information
Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication
Proposing a system to support crowdsourcing
Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication
Collaborative systems: characteristics and features
Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Allowing anyone to edit content is the philosophy of most wikis. Such approach does not ensure that the editor is a specialist in the topic and is well-meaning. Poor quality of the content and vandalism can be a major problem. We did a literature review on quality of information and criteria and examined a number wiki applications seeking to understand the process of authorship being used in larger wiki sites, such as those run by the Wikimedia Foundation and present a conceptual model to enforce quality in Wiki content. In this model, we suggest that each article should have an evaluation resulting from voting a pool of reviewers and that a historical record of the evaluation should be keep and available to users.