On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Artificial neural network representations for hierarchical preference structures
Computers and Operations Research
ELECTRE: A language using control structure expressions to specify synchronization
ACM '85 Proceedings of the 1985 ACM annual conference on The range of computing : mid-80's perspective: mid-80's perspective
Fuzzy least-squares priority method in the analytic hierarchy process
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty
Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Special issue on soft decision analysis
Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science
Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science
Database evaluation using multiple regression techniques
SIGMOD '84 Proceedings of the 1984 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Optimisation and decision
Expert Systems: Principles and Programming
Expert Systems: Principles and Programming
Fuzzy multi-criteria selection of object-oriented simulation software for production system analysis
Computers and Operations Research
Computers and Operations Research
Principles of Information Systems, 8th Edition
Principles of Information Systems, 8th Edition
Applicants' selection applying a fuzzy multicriteria CBR methodology
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology
A solution of data inconsistencies in data integration: designed for pervasive computing environment
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
A multi-criteria framework for assessing scholarship based on Boyer's scholarship model
Information-Knowledge-Systems Management
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Research is crucial in universities' contribution to national and global development. A few models have been developed for the evaluation of research contributions of university academic staff, especially at inter-institutional levels. Most of the models have focused on number and quality of output as key determinants of research productivity. In this study, a fuzzy-enhanced multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) model is developed for the evaluation of research at the individual level. The model takes into consideration a number of structured and unstructured criteria, which were weighted by decision experts with a measure of confidence. The results show that the highest premiums are placed on type of publication (25.8%) and quality of publication (25.0%). Others are: specialization/research focus (14.6%), reputation of publisher (13.3%), authorship (11.4%), and place of publication (9.9%). The study also provides a multi-dimensional basis of analysis of peer research output for selection purposes.