Automatic generation of min/max tolerance charts for tolerance analysis from CAD models

Authors:
Z. Shen;J. J. Shah;J. K. Davidson
Affiliations:
NX Part Modeling, UGS PLM Software, Siemens Automation & Drives, Cypress, CA, USA;Design Automation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;Design Automation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
Venue:
International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Year:
2008

Citing 4
Cited 0

An assembly modelling system for dynamic and kinematic analysis

Computer-Aided Design
Analysis of position uncertainties of parts in an assembly using configuration space in octree representation

SMA '95 Proceedings of the third ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications
Advanced Tolerancing Techniques

Advanced Tolerancing Techniques
CAD/Cam Theory and Practice

CAD/Cam Theory and Practice

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The so-called min/max tolerance charts are popular for analysing tolerance accumulation in parts and assemblies, despite the fact that this method is limited to one-dimensional worst-case analysis. Since different chart construction rules apply to different tolerance classes, the user has to remember all the different rules to construct a valid tolerance chart. Constructing the charts manually, as is common practice in industry today, is time-consuming and error-prone. This paper presents procedures for automating tolerance charting. It requires a computer aided design (CAD) model with GD&T specifications as input. The automation is based on a data model called the constraint-feature-tolerance (CTF) graph and machine interpretable representation of charting rules specific to each tolerance class. This paper also presents procedures for automatically extracting dimension and tolerance stacks for any user defined analysis dimension, and automatic part arrangement in assemblies corresponding to worst case analyses. Important implementation issues are also discussed and several case studies are presented, the results of which have been verified by manual chart construction.