Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaborations (Reprint)
Computer-supported cooperative work: a book of readings
Systems development in information systems research
Journal of Management Information Systems - Special issue on management support systems
Design and natural science research on information technology
Decision Support Systems - Special issue on WITS '92
The journal review process: a manifesto for change
Communications of the AIS
Viewpoint: One more revolution to make: free scientific publishing
Communications of the ACM
The language-action perspective as a basis for communication support systems
Communications of the ACM - Two decades of the language-action perspective
Journal of Management Information Systems
Design science in information systems research
MIS Quarterly
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Peer review is the engine of scholarship where new knowledge is legitimized. Despite technological advances in publishing and communication, the process of review has not changed since it became prevalent over 100 years ago. This paper describes how information technology can be used to improve the peer review process. Taking a combined design science and natural science approach, we design and test a prototype system based on the principles of structured communication. Through an exploratory study, we find that our proposed system is viewed more favorably by both authors and reviewers across several dimensions, including fairness, convenience, and value.