Using Dempster-Shafer theory and real options theory to assess competing strategies for implementing IT infrastructures: A case study

  • Authors:
  • Cokky Hilhorst;Piet Ribbers;Eric van Heck;Martin Smits

  • Affiliations:
  • Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands;Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands;RSM Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper discusses the selection of a preferred strategy for implementing an IT infrastructure from a range of competing alternatives. The model presented here combines the use of an evidential reasoning approach based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions with real options analysis. We discuss the combined use of both theories and show that combining the Dempster-Shafer theory with real options analysis provides flexible support that takes account of the multi-dimensional nature of implementation decisions. We also go into the fundamental requirements that need to be met when selecting a strategy for implementing an IT infrastructure. We conclude by outlining a number of the model's limitations.