The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS)
Improved upper and lower bounds for modal logics of programs
STOC '85 Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Handbook of theoretical computer science (vol. B)
About the expressive power of CTL combinators
Information Processing Letters
Theories of computability
Gap-languages and log-time complexity classes
Theoretical Computer Science
Introduction to Circuit Complexity: A Uniform Approach
Introduction to Circuit Complexity: A Uniform Approach
"Sometimes" and "not never" revisited: on branching versus linear time (preliminary report)
POPL '83 Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
STOC '71 Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
The complexity of generalized satisfiability for linear temporal logic
FOSSACS'07 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Foundations of software science and computational structures
The complexity of propositional implication
Information Processing Letters
A decidable spatial logic with cone-shaped cardinal directions
CSL'09/EACSL'09 Proceedings of the 23rd CSL international conference and 18th EACSL Annual conference on Computer science logic
Complexity results for modal dependence logic
CSL'10/EACSL'10 Proceedings of the 24th international conference/19th annual conference on Computer science logic
The Complexity of Reasoning for Fragments of Autoepistemic Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)
Complexity Results for Modal Dependence Logic
Studia Logica
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The satisfiability problems for CTL and CTL^@? are known to be EXPTIME-complete, resp. 2EXPTIME-complete (Fischer and Ladner (1979), Vardi and Stockmeyer (1985)). For fragments that use less temporal or propositional operators, the complexity may decrease. This paper undertakes a systematic study of satisfiability for CTL- and CTL^@?-formulae over restricted sets of propositional and temporal operators. We show that restricting the temporal operators yields satisfiability problems complete for 2EXPTIME, EXPTIME, PSPACE, and NP. Restricting the propositional operators either does not change the complexity (as determined by the temporal operators), or yields very low complexity like NC^1, TC^0, or NLOGTIME.