Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers
SIGCOMM '94 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Horus: a flexible group communication system
Communications of the ACM
In search of clusters (2nd ed.)
In search of clusters (2nd ed.)
Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks
MobiCom '99 Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking
A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks
MobiHoc '01 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
On the Quality of Service of Failure Detectors
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Implementation and Performance Evaluation of an Adaptable Failure Detector
DSN '02 Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks
Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing
WMCSA '99 Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications
Experimental Evaluation of the QoS of Failure Detectors on Wide Area Network
DSN '05 Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Ad hoc wireless networks are characterized with multi-hop connectivity and frequently changing network topology. Routing protocol plays a very important role to ensure each packet reaches its destination node in Ad hoc wireless network. Many different routing protocols have been proposed in literature, but no performance comparison of heartbeat-style failure detection service over them is available. In this paper, we do the comprehensive simulations to investigate the performance of heartbeat-style failure detector over proactive and reactive routing protocols with ns-2 simulator. The performance different are analyzed using varying the number of nodes, mobility speed, transmission range. Results show that DSDV performed better in average delay and average failure detection time, AODV performed better in normalized routing overhead, delivery ratio, energy consumption ratio, false detection ratio. The observations can be used to motivate and improve future implementations of failure detection service in Ad hoc wireless networks.