The Zeno argumentation framework
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
gIBIS: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation
HYPERTEXT '87 Proceedings of the ACM conference on Hypertext
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture
Modelling discourse in contested domains: a semiotic and cognitive framework
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Argumentation in the Semantic Web
IEEE Intelligent Systems
An Argumentation Framework for Communities of Web Services
IEEE Intelligent Systems
SIOC: an approach to connect web-based communities
International Journal of Web Based Communities
SALT - Semantically Annotated $\mbox{\LaTeX}$ for Scientific Publications
ESWC '07 Proceedings of the 4th European conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications
Ontology design patterns for semantic web content
ISWC'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on The Semantic Web
ESWC'05 Proceedings of the Second European conference on The Semantic Web: research and Applications
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Classic argumentative discussions can be found in a variety of domains from traditional scientific publishing to today's modern social software. An interactive argumentative discussion usually consists of an initial proposition stated by a single creator, followed by supporting propositions or counter-propositions from other contributors. Thus, the actual argumentation semantics is hidden in the content created by the contributors. Although there are approaches that try to deal with this challenge, most of them focus on a particular domain, limiting the scope of the argumentation to that domain only. In this paper, we describe an abstract model for argumentation which captures the semantics independently of the domain. Following a modularized approach, we also take into account additional important aspects of the argumentation, like the provenance information or its evolution (the temporal side).