A hierarchy of temporal properties (invited paper, 1989)
PODC '90 Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
Property specification patterns for finite-state verification
FMSP '98 Proceedings of the second workshop on Formal methods in software practice
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC)
Characterization of Temporal Property Classes
ICALP '92 Proceedings of the 19th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
Propositional Dynamic Logic of looping and converse
STOC '81 Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Defining Liveness
Foundations for the run-time analysis of software systems
Foundations for the run-time analysis of software systems
Computability classes for enforcement mechanisms
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS)
Proving the Correctness of Multiprocess Programs
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Enforcing non-safety security policies with program monitors
ESORICS'05 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Research in Computer Security
You should better enforce than verify
RV'10 Proceedings of the First international conference on Runtime verification
Runtime enforcement monitors: composition, synthesis, and enforcement abilities
Formal Methods in System Design
Corrective Enforcement: A New Paradigm of Security Policy Enforcement by Monitors
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC)
Iterative enforcement by suppression: Towards practical enforcement theories
Journal of Computer Security - ARSPA-WITS'10
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Runtime enforcement is a powerful technique to ensure that a program will respect a given security policy. We extend previous works on this topic in several directions. Firstly, we propose a generic notion of enforcement monitors based on a memory device and finite sets of control states and enforcement operations. Moreover, we specify their enforcement abilities w.r.t. the general safety-progress classification of properties. It allows a fine-grain characterization of the space of enforceable properties. Finally, we propose a systematic technique to produce an enforcement monitor from the Streett automaton recognizing a given safety, guarantee, obligation or response security property.