On the capabilities of multilayer perceptrons
Journal of Complexity - Special Issue on Neural Computation
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
COLT '92 Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory
The nature of statistical learning theory
The nature of statistical learning theory
Pattern classification: a unified view of statistical and neural approaches
Pattern classification: a unified view of statistical and neural approaches
Machine Learning - Special issue on learning with probabilistic representations
Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical
Advances in kernel methods
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks
Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Incorporating Invariances in Support Vector Learning Machines
ICANN 96 Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks
Training Support Vector Machines: an Application to Face Detection
CVPR '97 Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '97)
Pattern Classification (2nd Edition)
Pattern Classification (2nd Edition)
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Machine classifiers have been used to automate quantitative analysis and avoid intra-inter-reader variability in previous studies. The selection of an appropriate classification scheme is important for improving performance based on the characteristics of the data set. This paper investigated the performance of several machine classifiers for differentiating obstructive lung diseases using texture analysis on various ROI (region of interest) sizes. 265 high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) images were taken from 92 subjects. On each image, two experienced radiologists selected ROIs with various sizes representing area of severe centrilobular emphysema (PLE, n=63), mild centrilobular emphysema (CLE, n=65), bronchiolitis obliterans (BO, n=70) or normal lung (NL, n=67). Four machine classifiers were implemented: naive Bayesian classifier, Bayesian classifier, ANN (artificial neural net) and SVM (support vector machine). For a testing method, 5-fold cross-validation methods were used and each validation was repeated 20 times. The SVM had the best performance in overall accuracy (in ROI size of 32x32 and 64x64) (t-test, p