Theories: For Academics and Practitioners

Authors:
Scott Schneberger;Carol Pollard;Hugh Watson
Affiliations:
Principia College,;Appalachian State University,;University of Georgia,
Venue:
Information Systems Management
Year:
2009

Citing 5
Cited 1

Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think

Communications of the ACM
Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design

Management Science
Beyond rigor and relevance: producing consumable research about information systems

Information Resources Management Journal - Special issue on the role of business in information technology research
Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance

MIS Quarterly - Special issue on intensive research in information systems
Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud

MIS Quarterly - Special issue on intensive research in information systems

Quo vadis, design science? – a survey of literature

DESRIST'10 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Global Perspectives on Design Science Research

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Academics consider theories to be the bedrock of scientific research, while some business practitioners find them esoteric and difficult to understand. Previous discussions on this issue have often framed theories and research in terms of either rigor or relevance—with little middle ground for academics and practitioners to meet. This article maintains theories are useful to academics and practitioners, and that it is essential for both parties to take advantage of the characteristics and usefulness of theories. This article suggests specific ways academic researchers and business practitioners can effectively use a full range of theories.