Viewpoint: Research evaluation for computer science

Authors:
Bertrand Meyer;Christine Choppy;Jørgen Staunstrup;Jan van Leeuwen
Affiliations:
Eiffel Software, Santa Barbara, CA;Université Paris XIII;IT University, Copenhagen, Denmark;Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Venue:
Communications of the ACM - A Direct Path to Dependable Software
Year:
2009

Citing 1
Cited 9

Stop the numbers game

Communications of the ACM

Controversy Corner: An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions (2002-2006)

Journal of Systems and Software
The role of conference publications in CS

Communications of the ACM
Patterns of bibliographic references in the ACM published papers

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Controversy corner: An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions (2003-2007 and 2004-2008)

Journal of Systems and Software
Invisible work in standard bibliometric evaluation of computer science

Communications of the ACM
A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations

Empirical Software Engineering
To be or not to be cited in computer science

Communications of the ACM
How productivity and impact differ across computer science subareas

Communications of the ACM
Publish now, judge later

Communications of the ACM

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.09

Visualization

Abstract

Reassessing the assessment criteria and techniques traditionally used in evaluating computer science research effectiveness.