Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 1
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Lazy Induction of Descriptions for Relational Case-Based Learning
EMCL '01 Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning
Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning
MCS '00 Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Logical Preference Representation and Combinatorial Vote
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Learning and joint deliberation through argumentation in multiagent systems
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
A Short Introduction to Computational Social Choice
SOFSEM '07 Proceedings of the 33rd conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science
On the comparison of theories: preferring the most specific explanation
IJCAI'85 Proceedings of the 9th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Case-based learning from proactive communication
IJCAI'07 Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The purpose of this paper is to investigate how argumentation processes among a group of agents may affect the outcome of group judgments. In particular we will focus on prediction markets (also called information markets) and we will investigate how the existence of social networks (that allow agents to argue with one another to improve their individual predictions) effect on group judgments. Social networks allow agents to exchange information about the group judgment by arguing about the most likely choice based on their individual experience. We develop an argumentation-based deliberation process by which the agents acquire new and relevant information. Finally, we experimentally assess how different social network connectivity and different data distribution affect group judgment.