Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology

Authors:
Carmen López-Illescas;Félix De Moya Anegón;Henk F. Moed
Affiliations:
SCImago Group, Department of Library and InformationScience, University of Granada, Spain;SCImago Group, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC),Spain;Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), LeidenUniversity, The Netherlands
Venue:
Journal of Information Science
Year:
2009

Citing 0
Cited 4

The evaluation of Indian cancer research, 1990---2010

Scientometrics
International collaboration in Medical Research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007)

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan

Scientometrics
Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia

Scientometrics

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This article addresses the robustness of country-by-country rankings according to the number of published articles and their average citation impact in the field oncology. It compares rankings based on bibliometric indicators derived from the Web of Science (WoS) with those calculated from Scopus. It is found that the oncological journals in Scopus not covered by WoS tend to be nationally oriented journals, i.e. they mainly serve a national research community, and play as of yet a more peripheral role in the international journal communication system. In expanding the set of WoS journals with Scopus journals not indexed for WoS, the countries that profit most in terms of percentage of published documents tend to show a decline in their average citation rate. This paradoxical finding is further explained by mathematical - statistical considerations, and interpreted as a short term effect. The paper discusses its implications for the construction of bibliometric indicators.