Assessing the quality, success, and utility of M&S research

Authors:
Jeffrey S. Smith;John A. Drew Hamilton, Jr.;Richard E. Nance;Barry L. Nelson;George F. Riley;Lee W. Schruben
Affiliations:
Auburn University, AL;Auburn University, AL;Orca Computer, Inc., Blacksburg, VA;Northwestern University, Evanston, IL;Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA;University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Venue:
Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation
Year:
2008

Citing 0
Cited 3

Automating the runtime performance evaluation of simulation algorithms

Winter Simulation Conference
Experimental analysis of logical process simulation algorithms in JAMES II

Winter Simulation Conference
Panel discussion: education on conceptual modeling for simulation - challenging the art

Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper presents the "position papers" contributed by the participants of a panel at the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. As the paper pre-dates the actual panel, the purpose of the paper is to provide some background information about the views of the individual panelists prior to the actual panel. Each panelist was asked to submit a position paper addressing the general question of "What makes good Modeling and Simulation research?" This paper presents a summary of these position papers along with an introduction and conclusion aimed at identifying the common themes to setup the conference panel.