Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine
Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine
SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence
Artificial Intelligence
Context-based representation of intelligent behavior in training simulations
Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International
Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical and computational foundations
Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical and computational foundations
Autonomous Automobile Behavior through Context-Based Reasoning
Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
Context-Mediated Behavior for AI Applications
IEA/AIE '98 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems: methodology and tools in knowledge-based systems
Neural network based movement models to improve the predictive utility of entity state synchronization methods for distributed simulations
Representation of procedures and practices in contextual graphs
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Context in problem solving: a survey
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Evolving models from observed human performance
Evolving models from observed human performance
Famtile: an algorithm for learning high-level tactical behavior from observation
Famtile: an algorithm for learning high-level tactical behavior from observation
ACT-R: a theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention
Human-Computer Interaction
Task-Realization models in contextual graphs
CONTEXT'05 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Modeling and Using Context
Using contexts to supervise a collaborative process
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes an investigation that compared Context-based Reasoning (CxBR) and Contextual Graphs (CxG), two well-known context-driven approaches used to represent human intelligence and decision-making. The specific objective of this investigation was to compare and contrast both approaches to increase the readers’ understanding of each approach. We also identify which, if any, excels in a particular area, and to look for potential synergism between them. This comparison is presented according to 10 different criteria, with some indication of which one excels at each particular facet of performance. We focus the comparison on how each would represent human tactical behavior, either in a simulation or in the real world. Conceptually, these two context-driven approaches are not at the same representational level. This could provide an opportunity in the future to combine them synergistically.