CSCW '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Three Faces of Human-Computer Interaction
IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
How do design and evaluation interrelate in HCI research?
DIS '06 Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems
Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Gender differences and programming environments: across programming populations
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
Gender and computing conference papers
Communications of the ACM
Reject me: peer review and SIGCHI
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Citeology: visualizing paper genealogy
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Following bibliometric footprints: the ACM digital library and the evolution of computer science
Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
| Hi-index | 0.02 |
In this paper I show a variety of ways to represent and think about statistical aspects of CHI and its sister conferences. In particular, I look at author counts, gender analysis, and representations of repeat authors. I use these visualizations to motivate questions about what the preferred state of CHI should be. For example, should we strive for gender equality at CHI, and if so, why, and if not, why not? Should we encourage the current trend of increasing number of authors per paper, or might we be loosing something in that process? I do not hope to answer these questions, but rather to encourage their discussion.