The wisdom of the commons

  • Authors:
  • James A. Koziol;Anne C. Feng;Zhenyu Jia;Yipeng Wang;Seven Goodison;Michael McClelland;Dan Mercola

  • Affiliations:
  • -;-;-;-;-;-;-

  • Venue:
  • Bioinformatics
  • Year:
  • 2009

Quantified Score

Hi-index 3.84

Visualization

Abstract

Motivation: Classification and regression trees have long been used for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Nevertheless, instability and variable selection bias, as well as overfitting, are well-known problems of tree-based methods. In this article, we investigate whether ensemble tree classifiers can ameliorate these difficulties, using data from two recent studies of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer. Results: Using time to progression following prostatectomy as the relevant clinical endpoint, we found that ensemble tree classifiers robustly and reproducibly identified three subgroups of patients in the two clinical datasets: non-progressors, early progressors and late progressors. Moreover, the consensus classifications were independent predictors of time to progression compared to known clinical prognostic factors. Contact: dmercola@uci.edu