Principles of mobile communication (2nd ed.)
Principles of mobile communication (2nd ed.)
Applications of Digital Wireless Technologies to Global Wireless Communications
Applications of Digital Wireless Technologies to Global Wireless Communications
Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communication Systems
Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communication Systems
OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications
OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications
OFDM and MC-CDMA for Broadband Multi-User Communications, WLANs and Broadcasting
OFDM and MC-CDMA for Broadband Multi-User Communications, WLANs and Broadcasting
New high-rate wireless LAN standards
IEEE Communications Magazine
Transmission techniques for digital terrestrial TV broadcasting
IEEE Communications Magazine
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems for mobile applications suffer from inter-carrier-interference (ICI) due to frequency offset and to time-variation of the channels and from high peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR). In this paper, we revisit symmetric cancellation coding (SCC) proposed by Sathananthan et al. and compare the effectiveness of SCC with a fixed subtraction combining and the well-known polynomial cancellation coding (PCC) over Rayleigh fading channels with Doppler spread in terms of the signal-to-interference plus noise power ratio (SINR) and bit-error-rate (BER). We also compare SCC with subtraction combining and SCC of Sathananthan et al. with maximum ratio combining (MRC). Our results show that SCC-OFDM with subtraction combining gives higher SINR than PCC-OFDM over the flat Rayleigh fading channel and that this superiority is not maintained under multi-path induced frequency-selective fading unless diversity combining is used. A simulation result shows, however, that SCC-OFDM with subtraction combining may perform better than PCC-OFDM for a certain range of Doppler spread when differential modulation is employed. Finally, we also demonstrate that the SCC-OFDM signal has less PAPR compared to the normal OFDM and PCC-OFDM and hence may be more practical.