Practice Prize Report---The Power of CLV: Managing Customer Lifetime Value at IBM

Authors:
V. Kumar;Rajkumar Venkatesan;Tim Bohling;Denise Beckmann
Affiliations:
J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303;Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904;Americas Market Intelligence, IBM Corporation, New York, New York 10589;Americas Market Intelligence, IBM Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia 30327
Venue:
Marketing Science
Year:
2008

Citing 0
Cited 5

Customer-Base Analysis in a Discrete-Time Noncontractual Setting

Marketing Science
Practice Prize Winner---Dynamic Marketing Budget Allocation Across Countries, Products, and Marketing Activities

Marketing Science
Live-chat agent assignments to heterogeneous e-customers under imperfect classification

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS)
Effective Marketing Science Applications: Insights from the ISMS-MSI Practice Prize Finalist Papers and Projects

Marketing Science
A Joint Model of Usage and Churn in Contractual Settings

Marketing Science

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Customer management activities at firms involve making consistent decisions over time, about: (a) which customers to select for targeting, (b) determining the level of resources to be allocated to the selected customers, and (c) selecting customers to be nurtured to increase future profitability. Measurement of customer profitability and a deep understanding of the link between firm actions and customer profitability are critical for ensuring the success of the above decisions. We present the case study of how IBM used customer lifetime value (CLV) as an indicator of customer profitability and allocated marketing resources based on CLV. CLV was used as a criterion for determining the level of marketing contacts through direct mail, telesales, e-mail, and catalogs for each customer. In a pilot study implemented for about 35,000 customers, this approach led to reallocation of resources for about 14% of the customers as compared to the allocation rules used previously (which were based on past spending history). The CLV-based resource reallocation led to an increase in revenue of about $20 million (a tenfold increase) without any changes in the level of marketing investment. Overall, the successful implementation of the CLV-based approach resulted in increased productivity from marketing investments. We also discuss the organizational and implementation challenges that surrounded the adoption of CLV in this firm.