A method for member selection of R&D teams using the individual and collaborative information
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Configurations of knowledge transfer relations: An empirically based taxonomy and its determinants
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
Efficient Structures for Innovative Social Networks
Management Science
Patent collaboration and international knowledge flow
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Reputation inflation detection in a Chinese C2C market
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure
Organization Science
Small firms in multipartner R&D alliances: Gaining benefits by acquiescing
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
Structural Search and Optimization in Social Networks
INFORMS Journal on Computing
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management
The impact of small world on patent productivity in China
Scientometrics
Global supply network health: Analysis and visualization
Information-Knowledge-Systems Management - Enterprise Transformation: Manufacturing in a Global Enterprise
Hi-index | 0.01 |
The structure of alliance networks influences their potential for knowledge creation. Dense local clustering provides information transmission capacity in the network by fostering communication and cooperation. Nonredundant connections contract the distance between firms and give the network greater reach by tapping a wider range of knowledge resources. We propose that firms embedded in alliance networks that exhibit both high clustering and high reach (short average path lengths to a wide range of firms) will have greater innovative output than firms in networks that do not exhibit these characteristics. We find support for this proposition in a longitudinal study of the patent performance of 1,106 firms in 11 industry-level alliance networks.