Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing
Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Online power-aware routing in wireless Ad-hoc networks
Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Minimum energy paths for reliable communication in multi-hop wireless networks
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
An on-demand minimum energy routing protocol for a wireless ad hoc network
ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review
Power-Aware Localized Routing in Wireless Networks
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Non-Blocking, Localized Routing Algorithm for Balanced Energy Consumption in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
MASCOTS '01 Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium in Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems
International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing
Maximum battery life routing to support ubiquitous mobile computing in wireless ad hoc networks
IEEE Communications Magazine
Routing in ad hoc networks: a case for long hops
IEEE Communications Magazine
Survey Paper: Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: A survey
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, Minimum Energy Dynamic Source Routing (MEDSR) and Hierarchical Minimum Energy Dynamic Source Routing (HMEDSR) protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) are proposed. The objective of MEDSR protocol is to reduce energy consumption in MANET while maintaining connectivity in the network. The objective of HMEDSR is to reduce the overhead of MEDSR. The overall result is that energy spent in transmitting overhead packets is reduced. This reduction allows more energy in transmitting data packets. The Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol is modified to implement both MEDSR and HMEDSR protocols, and these implementations are tested with a network simulator (Network Simulator (NS-2)). The simulation results show that both MEDSR and HMEDSR protocols reduce energy consumption per data packet by 25% compared to DSR, but HMESDR further reduces energy consumption by 12% compared to MEDSR by controlling overhead packets.