Parallel Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computing)
Parallel Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley Series on Parallel and Distributed Computing)
A Parallel P2P Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Computational Grids
CCGRID '07 Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)
Peer-to-peer evolutionary algorithms with adaptive autonomous selection
Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Gossiping in distributed systems
ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - Gossip-based computer networking
Euro-Par '08 Proceedings of the 14th international Euro-Par conference on Parallel Processing
Branch-and-Bound interval global optimization on shared memory multiprocessors
Optimization Methods & Software - THE JOINT EUROPT-OMS CONFERENCE ON OPTIMIZATION, 4-7 JULY, 2007, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC, PART I
A peer-to-peer approach to genetic programming
EuroGP'11 Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Genetic programming
Validating evolutionary algorithms on volunteer computing grids
DAIS'10 Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 6.1 international conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems
Pool-Based distributed evolutionary algorithms using an object database
EvoApplications'12 Proceedings of the 2012t European conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Decentralized peer-to-peer (P2P) networks (lacking a GRID-style resource management and scheduling infrastructure) are an increasingly important computing platform. So far, little is known about the scaling and reliability of optimization algorithms in P2P environments. In this paper we present empirical results comparing two P2P algorithms for real-valued search spaces in large-scale and unreliable networks. Some interesting, and perhaps counter-intuitive findings are presented: for example, failures in the network can in fact significantly improve performance under some conditions. The two algorithms that are compared are a known distributed particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and a novel P2P branch-and-bound (B&B) algorithm based on interval arithmetic. Although our B&B algorithm is not a black-box heuristic, the PSO algorithm is competitive in certain cases, in particular, in larger networks. Comparing two rather different paradigms for solving the same problem gives a better characterization of the limits and possibilities of optimization in P2P networks.