Automatic Checklist Generation for the Assessment of UML Models

Authors:
Tom Gelhausen;Mathias Landhäußer;Sven J. Körner
Affiliations:
Institute for Program Structures and Data Organization, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany 76131;Institute for Program Structures and Data Organization, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany 76131;Institute for Program Structures and Data Organization, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany 76131
Venue:
Models in Software Engineering
Year:
2009

Citing 11
Cited 0

Program design by informal English descriptions

Communications of the ACM
Requirements and Psychology

IEEE Software
In Practice: UML Software Architecture and Design Description

IEEE Software
Effects of defects in UML models: an experimental investigation

Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
The Materiality of the Internet

IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
Guiding the Application of Design Patterns Based on UML Models

ICSM '06 Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance
Evaluating Quality in Model-Driven Engineering

MISE '07 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering
Thematic Role Based Generation of UML Models from Real World Requirements

ICSC '07 Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing
On the application of software metrics to UML models

MoDELS'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Models in software engineering
An experimental investigation of UML modeling conventions

MoDELS'06 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
GrGen: a fast SPO-based graph rewriting tool

ICGT'06 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Graph Transformations

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Assessing numerous models from students in written exams or homework is an exhausting task. We present an approach for a fair and transparent assessment of the completeness of models according to a natural language domain description. The assessment is based on checklists generated by the tool Sumo χ. Sumo χ directly works on an annotated version of the original exam text, so no ‘gold standard’ is needed.