Undergraduate software engineering laboratories: a progress report from two universities

Authors:
James Kiper;Michael J. Lutz;Henry A. Etlinger
Affiliations:
Miami Univ., Oxford, OH;Rochester Insitute of Technology, Rochester, NY;Rochester Insitute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Venue:
SIGCSE '92 Proceedings of the twenty-third SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Year:
1992

Citing 6
Cited 2

Programming in the large

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
The Z notation: a reference manual

The Z notation: a reference manual
Object-oriented software construction (2nd ed.)

Object-oriented software construction (2nd ed.)
Teaching Software Engineering in a Workstation Environment

IEEE Software
CADIZ - Computer Aided Design in Z

Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Z User Meeting on Z User Workshop
Structured Analysis and System Specification

Structured Analysis and System Specification

Yet, more Web exercises for learning C++

Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Incorporating realistic teamwork into a small college software engineering curriculum

Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Recently, both Miami University of Ohio and the Rochester Institute of Technology received NSF grants to develop undergraduate software engineering laboratories. While the general goals of the labs are similar, specific hardware and software selections were driven by differing curricular emphases and educational environments at the two institutions. This paper presents the distinctive characteristics of each school's program, discusses the influence of these features on the selection process, and describes our experiences to date with the resulting labs. The goal is to provide useful information guidance to others considering such facilities.