A comparison of optimistic approaches to collaborative editing of Wiki pages

  • Authors:
  • C.-L. Ignat;G. Oster;P. Molli;M. Cart;J. Ferrie;A.-M. Kermarrec;P. Sutra;M. Shapiro;L. Benmouffok;J.-M. Busca;R. Guerraoui

  • Affiliations:
  • LORIA, INRIA (Nancy-Grand Est), France;LORIA, INRIA (Nancy-Grand Est), France;LORIA, INRIA (Nancy-Grand Est), France;LIRMM, University of Montpellier 2, France;LIRMM, University of Montpellier 2, France;IRISA, INRIA (Rennes-Bretagne Atlantique), France;LIP6, INRIA (Paris-Rocquencourt), France;LIP6, INRIA (Paris-Rocquencourt), France;LIP6, INRIA (Paris-Rocquencourt), France;LIP6, INRIA (Paris-Rocquencourt), France;EPFL, Switzerland

  • Venue:
  • COLCOM '07 Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Wikis, a popular tool for sharing knowledge, are basically collaborative editing systems. However, existing wiki systems offer limited support for co-operative authoring, and they do not scale well, because they are based on a centralised architecture. This paper compares the well-known centralised MediaWiki system with several peer-to-peer approaches to editing of wiki pages: an operational transformation approach (MOT2), a commutativity-oriented approach (WOOTO) and a conflict resolution approach (ACF). We evaluate and compare them, according to a number of qualitative and quantitative metrics.