International Journal of Communication Systems - Special Issue: QoS Support and Service Differentiation in Wireless Networks
Effective capacity: a wireless link model for support of quality of service
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Time-varying fair queueing scheduling for multicode CDMA based on dynamic programming
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
Providing quality of service over a shared wireless link
IEEE Communications Magazine
On BS/BS coordination towards interference minimization in WiMAX networks
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Multi Objective Resource Scheduling in LTE Networks Using Reinforcement Learning
International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies
Implementation and validation of LTE downlink schedulers for ns-3
Proceedings of the 6th International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Designing scheduling algorithms at the medium access control (MAC) layer relies on a variety of parameters including quality of service (QoS) requirements, resource allocation mechanisms, and link qualities from the corresponding layers. In this paper, we present an efficient cross-layer scheduling scheme, namely, Adaptive Token Bank Fair Queuing (ATBFQ) algorithm, which is designed for packet scheduling and resource allocation in the downlink of OFDMA-based wireless 4G networks. This algorithm focuses on the mechanisms of efficiency and fairness in multiuser frequency-selective fading environments. We propose an adaptive method for ATBFQ parameter selection which integrates packet scheduling with resource mapping. The performance of the proposed scheme is compared to that of the round-robin (RR) and the score-based (SB) schedulers. It is observed from simulation results that the proposed scheme with adaptive parameter selection provides enhanced performance in terms of queuing delay, packet dropping rate, and cell-edge user performance, while the total sector throughput remains comparable. We further analyze and compare achieved fairness of the schemes in terms of different fairness indices available in literature.