Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence

Authors:
Floris Bex;Henry Prakken;Bart Verhey
Affiliations:
Centre for Law & ICT, University of Groningen, The Netherlands;Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands;Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
Year:
2006

Citing 3
Cited 4

Embracing causality in fault reasoning

Artificial Intelligence
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations

Artificial Intelligence and Law - Law, logic and defeasibility
Knowledge based crime scenario modelling

Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal

Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence

Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence

Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
AVER: Argument Visualization for Evidential Reasoning

Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
Did he jump or was he pushed?: abductive practical reasoning

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We will make some notions from the existing Anchored Narratives theory more clear by making use of two formal techniques from AI, namely causal-abductive reasoning and default-style argumentation. We will propose a combination of these two formalisms which solves some of the problems of the causal-abductive approach.