Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations
Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations
Machine Learning
A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization
ICML '97 Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning
Discourse segmentation of multi-party conversation
ACL '03 Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
INTERACT'05 Proceedings of the 2005 IFIP TC13 international conference on Human-Computer Interaction
SmartNotes: implicit labeling of meeting data through user note-taking and browsing
NAACL-Demonstrations '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology: companion volume: demonstrations
EMNLP '08 Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Automatic decision detection in meeting speech
MLMI'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Machine learning for multimodal interaction
Participants' personal note-taking in meetings and its value for automatic meeting summarisation
Information Technology and Management
Detecting individual role using features extracted from speaker diarization results
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Our goal is to automatically detect the functional roles that meeting participants play, as well as the expertise they bring to meetings. To perform this task, we build decision tree classifiers that use a combination of simple speech features (speech lengths and spoken keywords) extracted from the participants' speech in meetings. We show that this algorithm results in a role detection accuracy of 83% on unseen test data, where the random baseline is 33.3%. We also introduce a simple aggregation mechanism that combines evidence of the participants' expertise from multiple meetings. We show that this aggregation mechanism improves the role detection accuracy from 66.7% (when aggregating over a single meeting) to 83% (when aggregating over 5 meetings).