On Generalizing the AGM Postulates

  • Authors:
  • Giorgos Flouris;Dimitris Plexousakis;Grigoris Antoniou

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H., P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece, {fgeo, dp, antoniou}@ics.forth.gr;Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H., P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece, {fgeo, dp, antoniou}@ics.forth.gr;Institute of Computer Science, FO.R.T.H., P.O. Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece, {fgeo, dp, antoniou}@ics.forth.gr

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2006 conference on STAIRS 2006: Proceedings of the Third Starting AI Researchers' Symposium
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The AGM theory is the dominating paradigm in the field of belief change but makes some non-elementary assumptions which disallow its application to certain logics. In this paper, we recast the theory by dropping most such assumptions; we determine necessary and sufficient conditions for a logic to support operators which are compatible with our generalized version of the theory and show that our approach is applicable to a broader class of logics than the one considered by AGM. Moreover, we present a new representation theorem for operators satisfying the AGM postulates and investigate why the AGM postulates are incompatible with the foundational model. Finally, we propose a weakening of the recovery postulate which has several intuitively appealing properties.